[Jul 19 1:31 esaruoho] science never agreed to have him be a scientific figure, except a couple of people who focused enough on his cosmology to start realizing that it made more sense than godless science, or faith-based religion (instead of knowing god within)
[Jul 19 1:34 esaruoho] he was an intuitive inspired person striving for one-ness/unity with God / the universal one, way before he became a scientist to spread what he had been able to receive from the one source from which all things depend - -- and then found that science had worked itself into a dead-end, they had decided to come at it from a creation that is consistently dying instead of renewing itself in cycles of +/-
[Jul 19 1:35 esaruoho] tao of physics is one good way of seeing where exactly western "science" could learn from eastern metaphysics and both would benefit
[Jul 19 1:37 esaruoho] the only real way theres going to be any kind of balanced science is if whatever they find, is in total concordance with metaphysics or religious matter -- i.e. that both start looking at the one source -- i find a lot of stuff that ive read that is nonscientific, actually explains scientific things, if one realizes that religion and science are supposed to be one, but got completely derailed by dogmas and setups where people are busy building boxes to think inside instead of living knowledge
[Jul 19 1:48 esaruoho] but unfortunately the 2 minute "intros" do nothing of the sort to enlarge on how exactly, etc, what exactly, etc, why exactly should anyone care. its a shame that there are only just 2 "generic alternative energy documentaries" that talk about it.. i added the 3rd videoclip here
[Jul 19 1:50 esaruoho] nir the only way that walter russells ideas can be "so cohesive with those prevalent in buddhism" .. what could be the only way they can connect?? seriously. if two people reach a state of total oneness with the one and thus intuitively grasp knowledge out of that knowledgebank, they will mesh together almost 1:1 depending on if either of them have any hangups about understanding the words the other person uses. thats the only way they wont. then its a matter of degree of immersion, whave they been there completely or only for a short moment and thus didnt reach the condition of being totally one with the one -- .. but the language or the form is identifiable to one who has been one with the one
[Jul 19 1:52 esaruoho] the only way it could be fascinating and odd, if there were thirty billion different sources to patch onto, instead of just the one from which all things depend. so we plonk a dozen scientists or mystics onto a piece of paper, and start rummaging through how they described their higher experiences, and start drawing lines from them to the one, and suddenly they all start combining together as if by automation -- because all of those people were in touch with the one source
[Jul 19 1:57 esaruoho] thats why some science makes no sense, if ytou compare it to other science you see that they are all lost instead of zooming into one direction
[Jul 19 1:58 esaruoho] whereas when im looking at john keely, karl schappeller, viktor schauberger, nikola tesla, thomas henry moray, wilhelm reich, ed leedskalnin, walter russell they all line up, align and match, but with using different words. but thats because those people were actually quite highly attuned to nature
[Jul 19 2:01 esaruoho] and even university taught scientists who start studying tesla, accidentally start coming across the idea of a vortex, and an anti-vortex, balancing eachother.. and then start highlighting how physics and astrophysics and all kinds of other kinds of physics are grasping at dark matter and dark energy and all kinds of weird stuff to explain away things so that their formulas that are not based on reality, can match up again. i.e. instead of gravity being balanced by a reverse of it, they come up with compeltely new wonky ways of describing what it is that they refuse to accept as simple, but must over/complexify so that they can keep having their jobs
[Jul 19 2:02 esaruoho] here, here
[Jul 19 2:04 esaruoho] (thats two different heres btw). so in essence we have a godless science running around claiming there is no soul/spirit/higher thing than the brain and the body, so nothing spiritual or energetic, just the matter/physical/materialistic science, and they try to explain anything away with formula instead of realizing that this whole place is based on rhythmic balanced interchange between polar opposites (expanding vortex superimposed on an contracting vortex, or replace vortex with anything, be it +/- (not the adjectives) or aught at all))
[Jul 19 2:06 esaruoho] why would russell line up with buddhism unless if both were reaching inside for the knowledge instead of reaching for a microscope to study effect
[Jul 19 17:50 nir] yes, i think i understand what you're saying. if you're pointing to the connection between buddhism and russell's theories as mundane, i agree with you. i've stated before that what it is we consider extraordinary is indeed extra-ordinary. so ordinary we tend to overlook it since it doesn't play into our agendas
[Aug 01 16:09 esaruoho] well, what really isnt mundane is/are intuitive, spiritual scientists, or people who become such, and their viewpoints. thats nothing you learn in universities or scientific academies
[Jan 08 4:45 esaruoho] MOO!!!
[Feb 26 19:45 Ortali] mooooooooooo
[Jan 21 6:00 esaruoho] so here we are, nearing a year ago
[Apr 22 19:58 rdkls] who are ..... what the fuck ....
[Jul 18 18:26 recarovale] whoooo

you must be logged in to post to the wall...